Archive for the Miscellaneous category
Revolution spreads to America – Rap News Episode 7
by 10k films on June 8th, 2011
Thanks K.F.
‘The Way of the Warrior’ BBC Documentary
by 10k films on April 20th, 2011
‘The Way of the Warrior’ was a documentary shot by the BBC which aired in the 80s. The last part of the series was called: ‘The Samurai Way’. It was never to be released on DVD and has become rare collectors footage for martial artists all over the world.
A young(er) Risuke Otake explains and demonstrates the finer techniques and philosophies of Tenshin Shoden Katori Shinto Ryu. An must-see documentary for everyone who is interested in the way of the samurai. –Part 2 – 3 – 4
Nuclear Detonation Timeline “1945-1998″
by 10k films on August 9th, 2010
The Avatamsaka Sutra (Hwa-Om-Kyung) 화엄경
by 10k films on April 29th, 2010
The Avatamsaka Sutra (Hwa-Om-Kyung) 화엄경. Written and directed by Jang Sun-woo. Starring Oh Tae-kyung, Won Mi-kyung, Lee Ho-jae, Lee Hye-young, Kim Hye-seon, Lee Dae-ro, Dokko Young-jae, Shin Hyun-joon. Cinematography by Yoo Young-gil. Produced by Taehung Pictures. 126 min, 35mm, color. Winner of Alfred Bauer Award at 44th Berlin International Film Festival. More here and here
Qiu Chang Chun’s meeting with Genghis Khan
by 10k films on April 29th, 2010
Qiu Chuji (丘處機); Taoist name: Chang Chun (長春 or Perpetual Spring); 1148 – 23 July 1227) was a Quanzhen Taoist, one of Wang Chongyang’s seven disciples, or Seven Immortals. He was also the founder of Dragon Gate Taoism.
“Qiu Chang Chun Xi You Ji” 长春真人西游记 (Travels to the West of Qiu Chang Chun) was a record of the journey of Qiu Chuji from Shandong China through central Asia to Persia to present himself before Genghis Khan. In 1220, on the invitation of Genghis Khan with a golden tablet, Qiu Chuji left his home town Shangdong with eighteen disciples. Read Genghis Khans letter to him and an account of the journey and meetings they had.
For more on The Dragon Gate (Longmen 龙门派) sect of Complete Reality (QuanZhen 全真派) school of Taoism today see also “Opening the Dragon Gate: The Making of a Modern Taoist Wizard“, translated by Thomas Cleary.
The Known Universe
by 10k films on April 3rd, 2010
“The Known Universe” film by the American Museum of Natural History
한 (恨) – Han
by 10k films on February 28th, 2010
Han is a concept in Korean culture, attributed by some as a national cultural trait. Han denotes a collective feeling of oppression and isolation in the face of overwhelming odds. It connotes aspects of lament and unavenged injustice.
The Korean poet Ko Eun describes the trait as universal to the Korean experience: “We Koreans were born from the womb of Han and brought up in the womb of Han.” Han connotes both despair at recognition of past injustice and acceptance of such matters as part of the Korean experience.
“As I have already said, Han is an expression of the complex feeling which embraces both sadness and hope. The sadness stems from the effort by which we accept the original contradiction facing all living things, and hope comes from the will to overcome the contradiction. In the present, we accept it; in the future, we will overcome it. Life for all living things is full of contradictions. Where there is centrifugal force, there is also centripetal force. Where there is a beginning, there is also an end. Where space lasts for ever, time passes. And all who are born must die. Thus we become aware of existence, time, space and life itself. Finally, we have to admit the contradictory duality of life. It is very easy to resign ourselves to this contradiction, but we can think of it in another way. We can think of ourselves as actively conforming to the laws of the universe. This is the way in which Koreans strive to overcome the contradictions of life. When we are poor, we think of Han. We therefore work hard in order to buy lots of land. When we are ignorant, we are mindful of Han. We educate our children in order to deliver them from Han, that is why the passion for educating the young is so ardent in Korea. We cannot however completely deliver ourselves from Han in this world, because Han is also a hope for the future…”(Park Kyong-ni) Read more
The ego // The Ten Thousand Things
by 10k films on February 14th, 2010
Our form is the ego: it is this mysterious incapacity to be other than oneself, and at the same time the incapacity to be entirely oneself and not ‘other-than-Self’. But our Reality does not leave us the choice and obliges us to ‘become what we are’, or to remain what we are not.
The ego is, empirically, a dream in which we ourselves dream ourselves; the contents of this dream, drawn from our surroundings, are at bottom only pretexts, for the ego desires only its own life: whatever we may dream, our dream is always only a symbol for the ego which wishes to affirm itself, a mirror that we hold before the ‘I’ and which reverberates its life in multiple fashions.
This dream has become our second nature; it is woven of images and of tendencies, static and dynamic elements in innumerable combinations: the images come from outside and are integrated into our substance; the tendencies are our responses to the world around us; as we exteriorise ourselves, we create a world in the image of our dream, and the dream thus objectivised flows back upon us, and so on and on, until we are enclosed in a tissue, sometimes inextricable, of dreams exteriorised or materialised and of materialisations interiorised.
The ego is like a watermill whose wheel, under the drive of a current — the world and life — turns and repeats itself untiringly, in a series of images always different and always similar. The world: it is as if the ‘conscious Substance’ which is the Self had fallen into a state which would split it up in many different ways and would inflict on it endless accidents and infirmities; and in fact, the ego is ignorance floundering in objective modes of ignorance, such as time and space.
What is time, if not ignorance of what will be ‘after’, and what is space, if not ignorance of what escapes our sense? If we were ‘pure consciousness’ like the Self, we would be ‘always’ and ‘everywhere’; that is to say we would not be ‘I’, for that, in its empirical actuality, is entirely a creation of space and time. The ego is ignorance of what is ‘the other’; our whole existence is woven of ignorances; we are like the Self frozen, then hurled to earth and split into a thousand fragments; we observe the limits which surround us, and we conclude that we are fragments of consciousness and of being.
Matter grips us like a kind of paralysis, it imposes on us the heaviness of a mineral, and exposes us to the miseries of impurity and of mortality; form shapes us according to such and such a model, it imposes on us such and such a mask and cuts us off from a whole to which we are none the less tied, though at death it lets us fall as a tree lets fall its fruit; finally, number is what repeats us — inside ourselves as also around us — and what, in repeating us, diversifies us, for two things can never be absolutely identical; number repeats form as if by magic, and form diversifies number and must thus create itself ever anew, because the All-Possibility is infinite and must manifest its infinitude.
But the ego is not only multiple externally, in the diversity of souls, it is also divided within itself, in the diversity of tendencies and of thoughts, which is not the least of our miseries; for ‘strait is the gate’ and ‘a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven’. And since we are ‘not other’ than the Self, we are condemned to eternity.
Eternity lies in wait for us, and that is why we must find again the Centre, that place where eternity is bliss. Hell is the reply to the periphery which makes itself the Centre, or to the multitude that usurps the glory of Unity; it is the reply of Reality to the ego wanting to be absolute, and condemned to be so without being able to be so… The Centre is the Self ‘freed’, or rather that which has never ceased to be free—eternally free.




